|
|
|
|
Knowledge Management - Introduction : |
|
|
|
Knowledge Management caters to the critical issues of organizational adaptation, survival and competence in face of increasingly discontinuous environmental change. Essentially, it symbolizes organizational processes that seek interactive combination of data and information processing capacity of information technologies, and the creative and innovative capacity of human beings. An effective Knowledge Management System (KMS) is the key to future success. Such a system would empower the employees to access documents, course materials and external knowledge sources. In addition, it would connect corporate subject matter experts to the projects that can best benefit from their skill sets and provide them with the collaborative tools needed for effective project management. |
|
|
|
Knowledge Management before used to be simply the transfer of knowledge from one person to another, the result of which enabled the recipient to benefit from the collected wisdom of the more experienced members of an organization or group. Knowledge Management today, is a system of technologies focused upon the delivery of deliberately useful knowledge and expertise, which employee can use to up-to-date their knowledge, delivered in a timely manner, as a result of which any organization can get more satisfied customers, increased success and corporate value. |
|
|
|
Knowledge and Information : |
|
|
|
We must not confuse Knowledge with information. These two are distinct concepts that functions in completely different way. Information is tangible, hard numbers, facts. Knowledge is intangible, mental awareness, a part of the process of learning. Information represents the working and monitoring of physical objects. Knowledge represents mental objects, intellectual units that have a practical component. Information is independent of context. With Knowledge the context affects the meaning and value of the Knowledge. Information is easily transferable by means of recording and recitation. Knowledge requires learning and habituation for effective transfer. Information is easily reproducible by means of copying. Knowledge is seldom reproduced in a consistent fashion because it is filtered according to the perspective of each individual, his context and understanding. |
|
|
|
The consequence is that everything outside the mind that can be manipulated in anyway, can be defined as 'Data'. Collections of messages, composed in various ways, may be considered as 'Information'. Collections of papers in a journal, e-mail messages in an electronic 'folder', and manuscript letters in an archive and so on are termed as information resources. Thus, data and information may be managed, and information resources may be managed, but knowledge can never be managed. The fact is that we often do not know what we know: that we know something may only emerge when we need to employ the knowledge to accomplish something. |
|
|
|
|
Need of Knowledge Management : |
|
|
|
Knowledge Management is important for enterprises whose principal currency is knowledge, rather than physical or financial resources. These are enterprises who have always been wholly devoted to knowledge work, such as consultancies; a growing number of enterprises who discover that knowledge of how to produce products is as salable as the products themselves; and any enterprise who realizes that its knowledge is an asset to be managed. |
|
|
|
The ability of enterprises to manage knowledge as an asset (and provide a return on investment and potentially revenue) is seen by strategies such as Agility as the key to survival in a global business environment in which the efficiencies of mass production of commodity goods have been successfully exported to low-wage economies. The core issue of Knowledge Management is to place knowledge under management remit to get value from it - to realize intellectual capital. That intellectual capital can be regarded as a major determiner of the difference between a company's book price and the total value of its stock. |
|
|
|
The trends that are making Knowledge Management especially significant today: |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Need of post-industrial and knowledge-based commerce. |
|
| |
 |
Growth of interest in virtual teaming and Knowledge Management. |
|
| |
 |
Electronic collaboration tools. |
|
|
|
|
By identifying these challenges, then appreciating the capabilities of available technologies, and then knowing how to build virtual teaming skills and create Knowledge Management strategies, organization can grab the moment and significantly increase their ability to compete. |
|
|
|
Challenges and Difficulties : |
|
|
|
The challenge of deploying the knowledge assets of an organization to create competitive advantage becomes more crucial as: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
The marketplace is increasingly competitive and the rate of innovation is rising, so that knowledge must evolve and be assimilated at an ever-faster rate. |
|
| |
 |
Corporations are organizing their businesses to be focused on creating customer value and staffs functions are being reducing. There is a need to replace the informal Knowledge Management of the staff function with formal methods in customer aligned business processes. |
|
| |
 |
Competitive pressures are reducing the size of the workforce, which holds this knowledge. |
|
| |
 |
Knowledge takes time to experience and acquire. Employees have less and less time for this. |
|
| |
 |
There are trends for employees to retire earlier and for increasing mobility, leading to loss of knowledge. |
| |
 |
A change in strategic direction may result in the loss of knowledge in a specific area. A subsequent reversal in policy may then lead to a renewed requirement for this knowledge, but the employees with that knowledge may no longer be there. |
|
|
|
|
Identifying the knowledge assets and to use and manage them in an efficient and cost effective manner is also a problem associated along with the challenges. Organizations need: |
|
|
|
| |
 |
To have a wide vocabulary to ensure that the knowledge is correctly understood. |
|
| |
 |
To be able to identify, model and explicitly represent their knowledge. |
|
| |
 |
To share and re-use knowledge among different applications for various types of users. |
|
| |
 |
To create a culture that encourages knowledge sharing. |
|
|
|
At the strategic level the organization needs to be able to analyze and plan its business in terms of the current knowledge and the knowledge for future business processes. At the tactical level the organization is concerned with identifying and formalizing existing knowledge, acquiring new knowledge for future use, archiving it in organizational memories and creating systems that enable effective and efficient application of the knowledge within the organization. At the operational level knowledge is used in everyday practice by professional personnel who need access to the right knowledge, at the right time, in the right location. |
|
|
|
|
Knowledge Management Framework : |
|
|
|
The Knowledge Management framework originally based on work by Van Der Spek and De Hoog covers |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Identifying the knowledge assets |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Knowledge Asset - Knowledge assets are the knowledge regarding markets, products, technologies and organizations, that a business owns or needs to own and which enable its business processes to generate profits, add value, etc. |
|
| |
 |
What does it contains, use, form and accessibility? |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Analyzing how the knowledge can add values |
|
|
|
| |
 |
The opportunities for using the knowledge asset |
|
| |
 |
The effect of its use |
| |
 |
The current obstacles to its use |
| |
 |
Increased value to the company |
|
|
| |
 |
Specifying what actions are necessary to achieve better usability & added value |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Planning the actions to use the knowledge asset. |
|
| |
 |
Monitoring the actions |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Reviewing the use of the knowledge to ensure added value |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Review the desired added value. |
|
| |
 |
How can the knowledge asset be maintained for this use? |
|
| |
 |
Did the use create new opportunities? |
|
|
|
|
|
Knowledge Management Process : |
|
|
|
Ideally the Knowledge Management process involves |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Capturing the information |
|
| |
 |
Organizing and storing the data |
|
| |
 |
Sharing the information |
|
| |
 |
Application or leverage |
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional Approach of Knowledge Management: Enterprises have always been wished to capture and document processes, for quality purposes, automation, or to create documented methodologies. While routine work may be sufficiently captured for the purposes of quality or automation, enterprises often set out to capture non-routine work processes in documented methodologies. However major problems re there with documented methodologies - |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Context - If the methodology is too strongly related to a particular context then it may fail to be seen as relevant to another context. |
|
| |
 |
Dialogue - Typically only explicit or formal task elements of a process are documented and the dialogue, uncertainties, insights, interactions and discussions which made the process successful and not captured. The subsequent user then either needs to spend time with someone who was involved in the process, or get that person into the new team. Much of the operational information about the process resides with the involved team, and remains un-captured, unshared and unapplied by others. |
|
|
|
Computer Mediated Approach of Knowledge Management : In this approach, the knowledge is captured as it is created using the same tools as used in the process. Knowledge about the work can be used as soon as it is shared in the work and instantly applicable to any other work where it fits. The communications capability in this approach is also known as online conferencing, Bulletin boards, discussion forums, and threaded discussions. Computer conferencing has special significance for Knowledge Management because when a team uses computer conferencing to collaborate, a permanent, shareable, record of what they write and send to each other is created. That record captures the knowledge that the team created and applied to its work, and is the basis for managing the team's knowledge. |
|
|
|
The aspects of computer conferencing as a Knowledge Management tool: |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Context - Knowledge is highly contextual. Context binds messages and pieces of information together to form meaning and thus provides body of knowledge. It can include situations, relationships, assumptions, expectations and prior events. Adding context to information is one way to transform information to knowledge. One of the great advantages of computer conferencing as a Knowledge Management Process is that it superbly retains context. A computer conference lays out relate a series of history of a project or program - providing excellent clues as to what is going on or what went on, in the words that people used as part of their work. |
|
| |
 |
Structure - As a team creates and populates it's own computer conferences, emergent knowledge is placed within a structure of its own making. The mapping of subject matters to conferences and groups - is designed at the outset to reflect the team's intended work, and is continually iterated. Assuming that the team is alive to the need to design and re-design its electronic workspace, the structure of the team's computer conferences is by definition always a good approximation to the structure of the team's knowledge. |
|
|
|